Almost all the discussion consists of competent, well-informed summaries of texts, and less sophisticated summaries of philosophical positions. This definition of relativism is compatible with idealism, or realism, or almost anything else. Fortunately this does not seem to matter for the discussion in which it appears. In between the summaries, there is approximately one polemical point of comparison in each chapter, so I will attend to these.
Why would Nietzsche manipulate Plato in this way? Surely by now it is obvious that Plato was no philistine. He does not seem to have been dependent on art in the specific ways that Nietzsche required it. This, incidentally, has the general template of the oppositions that are set up in the book. And in this way any substantial opposition is obscured.
There are a number of deep issues that could have been discussed here: the need for a particular kind of paideia or Bildung to sustain a culture, the role of art in such a paideia , the rational standing of artistic creation, and whether a social regulation of art is possible. This might indeed be an informative generalization, but what does it mean? DMCA All papers are for research and reference purposes only! Create a new account It's simple, and free.
Email address. Login with Facebook. Is it possible for you to unclose it? Okay I see - thanks for the welcome! I just edited it again to make it more focused. Advantages and disadvantages in terms of what? What types of answers are you looking for here?
Hm, in terms of learning insightful things about the world, especially human psychology and the social sciences — InquilineKea. I have performed a major reformulation of the question in the hopes of clarifying and getting it some attention -- I wanted to let you know so that you could rollback if you must, but I would encourage you to try to keep it this specific at least, and improve and clarify it further if you can.
Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. To reformulate the question bit in more familiar terms: "Which type of argument is more robust to error: deductive or inductive? Improve this answer. Jon Ericson Jon Ericson 6, 4 4 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 64 64 bronze badges.
I strongly disagree with this characterization of Nietzsche; just because you don't find it appealing or find it difficult doesn't mean it lacks broad appeal or is "niche. Joseph: I concur with your disagreement. I wish I knew how to express my vague feeling that Nietzsche is more specific and thus less robust than Plato.
Tolstoy would be another example: he's still widely read, but not because lots of people agree with his philosophy. I wonder if part of why Nietzsche is widely read is that he's interesting in the extreme positions he took. But I'm just digging my hole of ignorance and unsupported assertions deeper, so I'll stop.
I appreciate the Nietzsche - niche duality there. Creating yourself, to me, is the most important thing we can do. I feel as though Nietzsche wants us to enjoy the small things in life and to take life as it comes. Honestly, Nietzsche has been my favorite philosopher to read and study, and the one whose viewpoint I agree with the most. There really are straightforward Socrates' primary advantages were morals and Epistemology.
Aristotle's principally centered around Sciences like-biology,zoology,physics,meta physics,geology,logic ,and furthermore on music,poetry… and so forth. Socrates was Plato's godlike object, tutor, and instructor.
From watching Socrates' rationalization strategy, Plato was roused to compose his discoursed, the best philosophical works of western vestige. Despite the fact that the two thinkers use structure to get objects, just Plato trusts it is required to pick up information. Plato additionally figures it basic to separate from this world to find an article's structure, though Aristotle accepts we need just examination the items and find its capacity teleology.
One of the essential contrasts among Plato and Socrates is that Plato gave a great deal of significance to the spirit of the person than the body. Then again, Socrates didn't talk much about the spirit. As per Plato, every individual has a capacity, and the city can be temperate when every one plays out his function.
This essay was written by a fellow student. You can use it as an example when writing your own essay or use it as a source, but you need cite it. Explore how the human body functions as one unit in harmony in order to life. Comparing and Contrasting the Philosophies. Free Essays - PhDessay. Accessed November 12, Foresters use different Silvicultural systems in order to handle woods throughout its life.
A silvicultural system can be defined as the procedure of be givening, reaping and renewing a wood..
0コメント