This settlement was not submitted to the Court of Cassation for final approval by the Prosecutor General because the Experts Committee was not the competent committee. The Council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Alaa Mubarak were not respected. The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Ms Rasekh were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
Ms Rasekh has not challenged the ruling of 8 March The investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing The Council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of Ms Rasekh were not respected. The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Gamal Mubarak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
On 8 March , the competent criminal Court upheld the prohibition order. Mr Gamal Mubarak has not challenged the ruling of 8 March After the conclusion of the investigations, the case was referred again to the court. On 15 September , the Cairo Criminal Court delivered a judgment by which: i it requested the expert committee it had appointed to complement the expert report it had submitted to the Court in July ; ii ordered the arrest of the defendants; and iii asked to refer the defendants to the National Committee for Recovery of Assets Located Abroad NCRAA with a view to a possible reconciliation.
On 27 June , Mr Gamal Mubarak was charged together with two other individuals with misappropriation of public funds and proceedings were initiated before the Cairo Criminal Court on 17 November In the course of the investigation proceedings Mr Gamal Mubarak has been questioned. The Council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Gamal Mubarak were not respected.
The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Ms El Gammal were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied. On 8 March , the competent criminal court upheld the prohibition order.
Ms El Gammal has not challenged the ruling of 8 March The Council has found no indication that the rights of defence or the right to effective judicial protection of Ms El Gammal were not respected. The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Garrana were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
The Council has found no indication that the rights of defence or the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Garrana were not respected. The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Mr Eladli were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied. Mr Eladli was referred by the investigating judge to the competent trial court on charges of misappropriation of public funds.
On 7 February , that Court decided that the assets of Mr Eladli, his spouse and minor son should be frozen. On 15 April , the Court convicted the defendant. The defendant challenged this judgment before the Court of Cassation, which quashed the verdict on 11 January and ordered a retrial. The new trial is still ongoing. The information on the Council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of Ms Sharshar were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the Council relied.
The husband of Ms Sharshar was referred by the investigating judge to the competent trial court on charges of misappropriation of public funds. On 7 February , that Court decided that the assets of her husband, her own and those of their minor son should be frozen.
Ms Sharshar has not challenged the Court ruling. Skip to main content. This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. It just says: 'Give us evidence'.
Is this reasonable? In response, Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt said the government were "working closely" with Egyptian authorities to "identify and restrain" assets identified as stolen. But he added: "It is crucial that the recovery and return of stolen assets is lawful.
It is simply not possible for the UK to deprive a person of their assets and return them to an overseas country in the absence of a criminal conviction and confiscation order. He said Britain could not have acted more quickly to freeze assets because such an order cannot be made on the basis of suspicion alone.
Omar Suleiman, head of Egyptian intelligence, acted as the official witness, according to reports in several newspapers. Fashion-savvy guests reported that the bride wore a dress by Lebanese designer Elie Saab. But Mubarak, the son of a president who has ruled for more than a quarter of a century, is not like any other Egyptian. In certain Cairene circles, he is viewed as a dapper, well-educated and, until recently, very eligible bachelor.
The fact that he was 43 and had never married had been a matter of frequent comment in Egypt. A few years ago, the White House was demanding democratic reform in the Middle East, believing that would uproot extremism. However, the civil war in Iraq and the sweeping electoral victories of Palestinian and Egyptian Islamists have silenced those demands. More than 20 Mubarak-era ministers and businessmen linked to the regime have been detained since February's uprising.
Earlier this month, former Interior Minister Habib al-Adly was sentenced to 12 years in jail on charges of money-laundering and profiteering.
Adly also faces separate charges of ordering troops to fire on demonstrators. He could face the death penalty if convicted. Hosni Mubarak is being held in a military hospital in Sharm el-Sheikh after reporting heart problems.
0コメント