More than , people were involved in the clean-up operation in and around the nuclear plant—in which other reactors remained operational until —and more than , people from the surrounding area permanently resettled outside of the 1, square mile exclusion zone. United Nations estimates say that more than 3. However, the toll of actual deaths from Chernobyl is a contentious issue, with estimates ranging widely and a paucity of Soviet documentation undermining efforts to clarify the casualty figures.
For all the disruption, the official Soviet death toll for the accident stands at just This comprises the two people killed immediately by the explosion and irradiation, plus the plant workers and first responders who were exposed to fatal doses of radiation in the days, weeks and months after as clean-up operations got underway.
A similar register in Belarus recorded 99, clean-up workers , while another registry including included , Russian liquidators. In Ukraine, death rates among these brave individuals has soared, rising from 3. Disability among the liquidators has also soared.
In Belarus, 40, liquidators were registered to have cancers by along with a further 2, from Russia. Another group who bore the brunt of the radiation exposures in the hours and days after the explosion were those living in the nearby town of Pripyat and the surrounding area. It took a day and a half before the evacuation began and led to 49, people being evacuated.
Later a further 41, people were evacuated from another 80 settlements in a 30km Some of those living closest to the power plant received internal radiation doses in their thyroid glands of up to 3. Doctors who have been studying the evacuees report that mortality among the evacuees has gradually increased, reaching a peak in with 18 deaths per 1, people.
Almost , people were evacuated from the area around Chernobyl in the months after the disaster but today the abandoned towns attract tourists Credit: Getty Images.
Brown has found evidence hidden in hospital records from around the time of the accident that show just how widespread problems were. Political pressure is widely thought to have led to the true picture of the problem to be suppressed by the Soviet authorities, who were keen not to lose face on the international stage. But following the collapse of the USSR and as people living in the areas that were exposed to radiation begin to present with a wide range of health problems, a far clearer picture of the toll taken by the disaster is emerging.
The NRCRM estimate around five million citizens of the former USSR, including three million in Ukraine, have suffered as a result of Chernobyl, while in Belarus around , people were registered as being affected by radiation following the disaster.
Even now the Ukrainian government is paying benefits to 36, women who are considered to be widows of men who suffered as a result of the Chernobyl accident. As of January , 1.
There has been a rapid increase in the number of people with disabilities among this population, rising from 40, in to , in The explosion that exposed the core in reactor number four at Chernobyl happened during a safety test and spread highly reactive material Credit: Getty Images.
Mortality rates in radiation contaminated areas have been growing progressively higher than the rest of the Ukraine. They peaked in when more than 26 people out of every 1, died compared to the national average of 16 for every 1, In total some ,sq km 57, sq miles of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine are considered to be contaminated and the 4,sq km 1, sq miles exclusion zone — an area more than twice the size of London — remains virtually uninhabited.
It is difficult to tell precisely how many deaths have been caused by the Chernobyl accident in the past 20 years as people who were exposed to additional low levels of radiation from the accident have been dying from the same causes as unexposed people. It is even harder to predict the possible number of future deaths. Therefore the exact death toll of the accident is likely to remain unknown.
Because large amounts of radioactive iodine were released as a result of the Chernobyl accident, the thyroid glands of local residents received considerable doses through breathing and through consuming contaminated foods, especially milk. Children are particularly vulnerable and there has been a substantial increase in thyroid cancer among people who were exposed as children.
More than cases of thyroid cancer were diagnosed in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine between and among those who were children and adolescents at the time of the accident.
Most of these cancers can be attributed to radiation. The majority of those patients have been treated successfully. New cases are expected to be diagnosed for many more years. It should be noted that early mitigation measures distribution of iodine tablets and evacuation helped substantially to minimize the health consequences of the accident.
It may also increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases in population groups exposed to higher doses such as atomic bomb survivors or radiotherapy patients. Between and , the number of cases of non-CLL leukaemia doubled among Russian workers who had been exposed to external doses higher than mGy. However, the risk of radiation -induced leukemia is likely to decrease in the future, because it usually takes up to 10 years from the moment of exposure to develop radiation-induced leukemia.
Russian emergency and recovery operation workers also seem to have more solid cancers and possibly more cardiovascular diseases than the general population. However, the higher levels of cardiovascular diseases could also be caused by other factors such as stress and unhealthy lifestyles. Nonetheless, highly- exposed Chernobyl workers should continue to receive medical care and annual examinations.
Its cost has been estimated at 1. It took nine years after the fall of the USSR to close the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station and more than a quarter century to build a new shelter over the damaged reactor. The international community emerged victorious in the contest of security priorities. Relations between the two main actors in the post-Chernobyl drama, the Western funding agencies and the Ukrainian government, were not unlike those in a family with a teenager who promises not to behave dangerously if given an ever larger allowance.
Some scholars referred to it as environmental blackmail. But the closure of the Chernobyl power plant and the construction of the new shelter is more than just a story of nuclear extortion of funds by a poor country from rich ones. More than anything else, it is a story of the clash between the demands of individual nations for economic development and the security of the world, as well as of the threat posed to the latter by the political and economic decline of the nuclear powers and the uncertain future of the post-imperial states.
Moscow, the former capital of the empire responsible for the design and operation of the damaged reactor, all but retreated behind the borders of the Russian Federation, leaving it to Ukraine and the international community to clean up the mess.
The war also interrupted the nuclear cycle whereby Ukraine received its nuclear fuel from Russia and sent its spent fuel back there. In , Ukraine began the construction of its own spent-fuel facility and declared plans to reduce its almost total dependence on Russian fuel by covering 40 percent of its needs with purchases from the U. While the war and the disruption of the traditional nuclear cycle brought new challenges to the struggling Ukrainian economy, the nuclear industry of the land of Chernobyl took another important step away from its Soviet legacy.
What remained unchanged and impervious to remedy by any amount of internal mobilization or outside assistance were the long-term consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. While the actual impact of radiation exposure on the health of the population is still debated, there can be little doubt that the society as a whole was left traumatized for decades to come.
And then there is the environment. The new shelter over the damaged reactor No. In April , when the world marked the thirtieth anniversary of the disaster, there was a temptation to breathe a sigh of relief.
The half-life of cesium, one of the most harmful nuclides released during the accident, is approximately thirty years. Other deadly isotopes present in the disaster have long passed their half-life stages: iodine after eight days, and cesium after two years. Cesium is the last of that deadly trio of isotopes. But the harmful impact of the accident is still far from over.
0コメント